MATCHSTAT PRO

Every edge, every game, every day

New customer offer
One Sport
All Sports Promo
Tennis
$29.99/billed monthly
  • Unlimited daily predictions
  • Unlock best bets with edge
  • Access all tipster picks
  • Filter & segment data
  • Unlock all models
  • CANCEL ANYTIME
Subscribe

Prediction of Nicolas Kicker [462nd] vs Botic Van De Zandschulp [89th] Head-to-Head At The

By Wojtek Kolan

Head-To-Head: Kicker 1 - 0 Zandschulp

They have played 3 sets in total, with Kicker winning 2 and Zandschulp winning 1. The last match between Kicker and Zandschulp was at the Tampere Challenger, 24-07-2021, Semifinals, Clay with Nicolas Kicker getting the victory 6-3 3-6 6-3.

Players Head-To-Head Match Wins
Nicolas Kicker 1
Botic Van De Zandschulp 0
Kicker vs Zandschulp H2H Profile
Kicker Stats Zandschulp
68% (17-8) YTD Win/Loss 43% (9-12)
1 Head-to-Head 0
462 Ranking 89
78 Highest Rank 22
32 Age 29
R Plays R
18 Titles 7
59% (376-261) Career Total W/L 62% (362-226)
$521,720 Career Prize Money $3,456,920
1 Clay H2H 0

Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)

Kicker VS Zandschulp H2H Matches played

Winning Player Losing Player Score
6-3 3-6 6-3
cross
Nicolas Kicker
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
72% ( 56 of 78)
1st Serve %
58% ( 49 of 84)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
54% ( 30 of 56)
1st Serve Won
57% ( 28 of 49)
68% ( 15 of 22)
2nd Serve Won
54% ( 19 of 35)
75% ( 6 of 8)
Break Points Won
100% ( 4 of 4)
42% ( 33 of 78)
Rtn Points Won
44% ( 37 of 84)
82
Total Points Won
80

Kicker VS Zandschulp H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

Kicker Vs Zandschulp H2H Stats
Nicolas Kicker Kicker Stats Botic Van De Zandschulp Zandschulp
1 H2H Matches 0
2 Sets Won 1
15 Games Won 12
1 Aces (Total) 3
1 Total Double Faults 2
2:16:46 Average Match Time 2:16:46
72% (56/78) 1st Serve % 58% (49/84)
54% (30/56) 1st Serve Win % 57% (28/49)
68% (15/22) 2nd Serve Win % 54% (19/35)
75% (6/8) Break Points Won % (Total) 100% (4/4)
44% (37/84) Return Points Win % 42% (33/78)
100% (1/1) Best of 3 Sets Win % 0% (0/1)
0% (0/0) Best of 5 Sets Win % 0% (0/0)
0% (0/0) Tiebreaks Win % (Total) 0% (0/0)
100% (1/1) Deciding Set Win % 0% (0/1)
100% (1/1) 1st Set Won, Won Match 0% (0/0)
0% (1/0) 1st Set Won, Lost Match 0% (0/0)
0% (0/0) 1st Set Lost, Won Match 0% (1/0)

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

Nicolas Kicker vs Botic Van De Zandschulp Important H2H Prediction Stats:

Head-to-head: Kicker 1 - 0 Zandschulp

Editorial Prediction:

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kicker has won 39.77% of points on their second serve, while Zandschulp has won 43.27%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kicker, in recent form, has won 44.83% of their opponent's second serve points, while Zandschulp has won 47.3%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.86% and 27.05% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Kicker has saved 47.84% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Zandschulp has saved 50% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Kicker has won 62.22% of matches played (W/L 28/ 17), with Zandschulp winning 51.47% (W/L 35/ 33) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Kicker has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 342/ 226), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Zandschulp has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 63% (W/L 93/ 54), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 46% (W/L 11/ 13).
  • Player level: In the last year, Kicker has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 58.33% of matches (W/L 14/ 10), where as Zandschulp has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 44.44% of matches (W/L 12/ 15). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Kicker winning 1 times and Zandschulp being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Kicker winning 2 and Zandschulp winning 1. The last match between Kicker and Zandschulp was at the Tampere Challenger, 24-07-2021, Semifinals, Clay with Nicolas Kicker getting the victory 6-3 3-6 6-3.
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:16:46.
  • Deciding set H2H prediction: Kicker and Zandschulp have played a deciding set 1 times, with Kicker winning 1 times and Zandschulp 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
  • Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Kicker winning 0, and Zandschulp 0.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kicker has played against opponents with an average rank of 325.82 while Zandschulp has played against players with an average rank of 133.59.
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kicker has won 78% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Zandschulp has won 43% in all matches played on tour.
  • Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Kicker has converted 40.3% of breakpoint opportunities, and Zandschulp has converted 33.08% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
  • If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
  • Nicolas Kicker Recent Matches Played

    OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
    F
    cross
    Emilio Nava
    Player
    Nicolas Kicker
    66% ( 41 of 62)
    1st Serve %
    65% ( 45 of 69)
    6
    Aces
    0
    1
    Double Faults
    5
    80% ( 33 of 41)
    1st Serve Won
    64% ( 29 of 45)
    48% ( 10 of 21)
    2nd Serve Won
    33% ( 8 of 24)
    33% ( 3 of 9)
    Break Points Won
    33% ( 1 of 3)
    31% ( 19 of 62)
    Rtn Points Won
    46% ( 32 of 69)
    75
    Total Points Won
    56
    L
    6-1 7-6(3) H2H
    SF
    cross
    Nicolas Kicker
    Player
    Matias Soto
    64% ( 62 of 97)
    1st Serve %
    48% ( 46 of 95)
    2
    Aces
    4
    1
    Double Faults
    4
    56% ( 35 of 62)
    1st Serve Won
    57% ( 26 of 46)
    66% ( 23 of 35)
    2nd Serve Won
    55% ( 27 of 49)
    60% ( 6 of 10)
    Break Points Won
    56% ( 5 of 9)
    40% ( 39 of 97)
    Rtn Points Won
    44% ( 42 of 95)
    100
    Total Points Won
    92
    W
    4-6 7-5 6-3 H2H
    QF
    cross
    Nicolas Kicker
    Player
    Guido Ivan Justo
    70% ( 49 of 70)
    1st Serve %
    62% ( 44 of 71)
    0
    Aces
    3
    0
    Double Faults
    1
    57% ( 28 of 49)
    1st Serve Won
    59% ( 26 of 44)
    67% ( 14 of 21)
    2nd Serve Won
    52% ( 14 of 27)
    63% ( 5 of 8)
    Break Points Won
    67% ( 4 of 6)
    40% ( 28 of 70)
    Rtn Points Won
    44% ( 31 of 71)
    73
    Total Points Won
    68
    W
    6-4 1-6 6-1 H2H
    R2
    cross
    Nicolas Kicker
    Player
    Juan Pablo Varillas
    81% ( 25 of 31)
    1st Serve %
    61% ( 34 of 56)
    0
    Aces
    0
    1
    Double Faults
    0
    84% ( 21 of 25)
    1st Serve Won
    50% ( 17 of 34)
    50% ( 3 of 6)
    2nd Serve Won
    23% ( 5 of 22)
    33% ( 6 of 18)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 0)
    23% ( 7 of 31)
    Rtn Points Won
    61% ( 34 of 56)
    58
    Total Points Won
    29
    W
    6-0 6-1 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Nicolas Kicker
    Player
    Adolfo Daniel Vallejo
    63% ( 22 of 35)
    1st Serve %
    63% ( 29 of 46)
    0
    Aces
    2
    0
    Double Faults
    2
    77% ( 17 of 22)
    1st Serve Won
    52% ( 15 of 29)
    85% ( 11 of 13)
    2nd Serve Won
    24% ( 4 of 17)
    42% ( 5 of 12)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 0)
    20% ( 7 of 35)
    Rtn Points Won
    59% ( 27 of 46)
    55
    Total Points Won
    26
    W
    6-1 6-1 H2H
    QF
    cross
    Nicolas Kicker
    Player
    Wilson Leite
    62% ( 53 of 86)
    1st Serve %
    58% ( 52 of 90)
    5
    Aces
    1
    4
    Double Faults
    3
    74% ( 39 of 53)
    1st Serve Won
    54% ( 28 of 52)
    42% ( 14 of 33)
    2nd Serve Won
    55% ( 21 of 38)
    33% ( 5 of 15)
    Break Points Won
    38% ( 3 of 8)
    38% ( 33 of 86)
    Rtn Points Won
    46% ( 41 of 90)
    94
    Total Points Won
    82
    W
    6-4 3-6 6-1 H2H
    Q1
    cross
    Nicolas Kicker
    Player
    Felix Corwin
    65% ( 42 of 65)
    1st Serve %
    65% ( 57 of 88)
    2
    Aces
    1
    4
    Double Faults
    1
    71% ( 30 of 42)
    1st Serve Won
    56% ( 32 of 57)
    65% ( 15 of 23)
    2nd Serve Won
    45% ( 14 of 31)
    42% ( 5 of 12)
    Break Points Won
    50% ( 1 of 2)
    31% ( 20 of 65)
    Rtn Points Won
    48% ( 42 of 88)
    87
    Total Points Won
    66
    W
    3-6 6-1 6-1 H2H
    QF
    cross
    Mariano Kestelboim
    Player
    Nicolas Kicker
    66% ( 44 of 67)
    1st Serve %
    63% ( 38 of 60)
    1
    Aces
    0
    0
    Double Faults
    2
    66% ( 29 of 44)
    1st Serve Won
    47% ( 18 of 38)
    48% ( 11 of 23)
    2nd Serve Won
    45% ( 10 of 22)
    71% ( 5 of 7)
    Break Points Won
    18% ( 2 of 11)
    40% ( 27 of 67)
    Rtn Points Won
    53% ( 32 of 60)
    72
    Total Points Won
    55
    L
    6-3 6-2 H2H
    Q1
    cross
    Nicolas Kicker
    Player
    Arvid Nordquist
    58% ( 29 of 50)
    1st Serve %
    71% ( 47 of 66)
    1
    Aces
    3
    3
    Double Faults
    3
    76% ( 22 of 29)
    1st Serve Won
    66% ( 31 of 47)
    57% ( 12 of 21)
    2nd Serve Won
    0% ( 0 of 19)
    45% ( 5 of 11)
    Break Points Won
    50% ( 1 of 2)
    32% ( 16 of 50)
    Rtn Points Won
    53% ( 35 of 66)
    69
    Total Points Won
    47
    W
    6-3 6-2 H2H
    SF
    cross
    Daniel Dutra Da Silva
    Player
    Nicolas Kicker
    61% ( 55 of 90)
    1st Serve %
    64% ( 42 of 66)
    4
    Aces
    1
    2
    Double Faults
    2
    76% ( 42 of 55)
    1st Serve Won
    76% ( 32 of 42)
    46% ( 16 of 35)
    2nd Serve Won
    63% ( 15 of 24)
    100% ( 2 of 2)
    Break Points Won
    20% ( 2 of 10)
    36% ( 32 of 90)
    Rtn Points Won
    29% ( 19 of 66)
    77
    Total Points Won
    79
    L
    2-6 6-3 6-4 H2H

    Botic Van De Zandschulp Recent Matches Played

    OPPONENT RESULT Score H2H
    R2
    cross
    Ben Shelton
    Player
    Botic Van De Zandschulp
    68% ( 40 of 59)
    1st Serve %
    59% ( 40 of 68)
    3
    Aces
    4
    2
    Double Faults
    5
    83% ( 33 of 40)
    1st Serve Won
    68% ( 27 of 40)
    58% ( 11 of 19)
    2nd Serve Won
    50% ( 14 of 28)
    100% ( 3 of 3)
    Break Points Won
    100% ( 1 of 1)
    25% ( 15 of 59)
    Rtn Points Won
    40% ( 27 of 68)
    71
    Total Points Won
    56
    L
    7-6(1) 6-3 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Botic Van De Zandschulp
    Player
    Roberto Bautista Agut
    72% ( 60 of 83)
    1st Serve %
    66% ( 64 of 97)
    11
    Aces
    0
    4
    Double Faults
    1
    77% ( 46 of 60)
    1st Serve Won
    66% ( 42 of 64)
    43% ( 10 of 23)
    2nd Serve Won
    58% ( 19 of 33)
    18% ( 2 of 11)
    Break Points Won
    67% ( 2 of 3)
    33% ( 27 of 83)
    Rtn Points Won
    37% ( 36 of 97)
    92
    Total Points Won
    88
    W
    6-4 3-6 6-4 H2H
    QF
    cross
    Learner Tien
    Player
    Botic Van De Zandschulp
    58% ( 29 of 50)
    1st Serve %
    48% ( 26 of 54)
    1
    Aces
    0
    1
    Double Faults
    4
    76% ( 22 of 29)
    1st Serve Won
    62% ( 16 of 26)
    48% ( 10 of 21)
    2nd Serve Won
    29% ( 8 of 28)
    63% ( 5 of 8)
    Break Points Won
    25% ( 1 of 4)
    36% ( 18 of 50)
    Rtn Points Won
    56% ( 30 of 54)
    62
    Total Points Won
    42
    L
    6-2 6-2 H2H
    Q1
    cross
    Botic Van De Zandschulp
    Player
    Max Hans Rehberg
    56% ( 25 of 45)
    1st Serve %
    52% ( 24 of 46)
    3
    Aces
    1
    2
    Double Faults
    6
    84% ( 21 of 25)
    1st Serve Won
    71% ( 17 of 24)
    65% ( 13 of 20)
    2nd Serve Won
    32% ( 7 of 22)
    80% ( 4 of 5)
    Break Points Won
    0% ( 0 of 1)
    24% ( 11 of 45)
    Rtn Points Won
    48% ( 22 of 46)
    56
    Total Points Won
    35
    W
    6-3 6-1 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Richard Gasquet
    Player
    Botic Van De Zandschulp
    64% ( 63 of 98)
    1st Serve %
    59% ( 55 of 93)
    2
    Aces
    5
    2
    Double Faults
    5
    65% ( 41 of 63)
    1st Serve Won
    65% ( 36 of 55)
    51% ( 18 of 35)
    2nd Serve Won
    39% ( 15 of 38)
    40% ( 6 of 15)
    Break Points Won
    40% ( 4 of 10)
    40% ( 39 of 98)
    Rtn Points Won
    45% ( 42 of 93)
    101
    Total Points Won
    90
    L
    4-6 7-5 6-1 H2H
    R3
    cross
    Francisco Cerundolo
    Player
    Botic Van De Zandschulp
    54% ( 38 of 71)
    1st Serve %
    65% ( 37 of 57)
    2
    Aces
    1
    2
    Double Faults
    2
    66% ( 25 of 38)
    1st Serve Won
    65% ( 24 of 37)
    61% ( 20 of 33)
    2nd Serve Won
    45% ( 9 of 20)
    75% ( 3 of 4)
    Break Points Won
    20% ( 1 of 5)
    37% ( 26 of 71)
    Rtn Points Won
    42% ( 24 of 57)
    69
    Total Points Won
    59
    L
    6-3 6-4 H2H
    R2
    cross
    Botic Van De Zandschulp
    Player
    Novak Djokovic
    71% ( 58 of 82)
    1st Serve %
    67% ( 49 of 73)
    4
    Aces
    0
    4
    Double Faults
    3
    60% ( 35 of 58)
    1st Serve Won
    63% ( 31 of 49)
    71% ( 17 of 24)
    2nd Serve Won
    29% ( 7 of 24)
    63% ( 5 of 8)
    Break Points Won
    50% ( 2 of 4)
    37% ( 30 of 82)
    Rtn Points Won
    48% ( 35 of 73)
    87
    Total Points Won
    68
    W
    6-2 3-6 6-1 H2H
    R1
    cross
    Botic Van De Zandschulp
    Player
    Nick Kyrgios
    59% ( 35 of 59)
    1st Serve %
    58% ( 34 of 59)
    2
    Aces
    6
    3
    Double Faults
    2
    71% ( 25 of 35)
    1st Serve Won
    68% ( 23 of 34)
    54% ( 13 of 24)
    2nd Serve Won
    36% ( 9 of 25)
    75% ( 3 of 4)
    Break Points Won
    29% ( 2 of 7)
    36% ( 21 of 59)
    Rtn Points Won
    46% ( 27 of 59)
    65
    Total Points Won
    53
    W
    7-6(7) 3-0 ret. H2H
    QF
    cross
    Matteo Gigante
    Player
    Botic Van De Zandschulp
    68% ( 40 of 59)
    1st Serve %
    39% ( 21 of 54)
    5
    Aces
    3
    5
    Double Faults
    1
    75% ( 30 of 40)
    1st Serve Won
    52% ( 11 of 21)
    32% ( 6 of 19)
    2nd Serve Won
    42% ( 14 of 33)
    75% ( 6 of 8)
    Break Points Won
    40% ( 2 of 5)
    39% ( 23 of 59)
    Rtn Points Won
    54% ( 29 of 54)
    65
    Total Points Won
    48
    L
    7-5 6-0 H2H
    Q1
    cross
    Botic Van De Zandschulp
    Player
    Lukas Klein
    51% ( 63 of 124)
    1st Serve %
    56% ( 71 of 127)
    7
    Aces
    2
    7
    Double Faults
    8
    67% ( 42 of 63)
    1st Serve Won
    55% ( 39 of 71)
    44% ( 27 of 61)
    2nd Serve Won
    45% ( 25 of 56)
    37% ( 7 of 19)
    Break Points Won
    25% ( 5 of 20)
    44% ( 55 of 124)
    Rtn Points Won
    50% ( 63 of 127)
    132
    Total Points Won
    119
    W
    5-7 6-3 6-3 H2H
    banner

    Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

    Kicker & Zandschulp Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
    Nicolas Kicker Kicker Stats Botic Van De Zandschulp Zandschulp
    59% (376/261) Win/Loss 62% (362/226)
    57% (855/641) Sets Win/Loss 58% (824/589)
    53% (7361/6511) Games Win/Loss 53% (7081/6262)
    0.1 Aces Per Game 0.44
    700 Aces Total 2872
    0.14 Double Faults Per Game 0.33
    963 Total Double Faults 2134
    1:12:13 Average Match Time 1:35:30
    512.39 Average Opponent Rank 383.64
    65% (19160/29549) 1st Serve % 62% (23929/38869)
    65% (12548/19160) 1st Serve Win % 71% (17094/23929)
    52% (5351/10389) 2nd Serve Win % 48% (7201/14943)
    44% (1412/3233) Break Points Won % (Total) 43% (1770/4108)
    42% (12515/30064) Return Points Win % 41% (16289/40062)
    59% (369/623) Best of 3 Sets Win % 62% (335/537)
    42% (5/12) Best of 5 Sets Win % 53% (20/38)
    53% (92/175) Tiebreaks Win % (Total) 55% (100/181)
    53% (110/208) Deciding Set Win % 58% (112/194)
    85% (372/315) 1st Set Won, Won Match 89% (341/302)
    15% (372/56) 1st Set Won, Lost Match 11% (341/38)
    23% (265/60) 1st Set Lost, Won Match 24% (245/59)

    Other Predictions

    Gwangju Challenger

    flag
    flag
    Prediction

    Abidjan 2 Challenger

    flag
    flag
    Prediction

    Abidjan 2 Challenger

    flag
    flag
    Prediction
    • Loading news...